Disclaimer
I don't "understand" my enemy, who is doing his devilish best to destroy me and mine; I HATE my enemy. I want to kill my enemy; I want to chop his fucking head off and take a good long shit down his gaping neck. I want to smash his head to a paste and then urinate on it.I know well (though I cannot understand it) that others who have identified the enemy, consider me "extreme" or crazy or "evil", because all they want is to be left alone. They don't "hate" anyone; they just would like the enemy to please stop trying to destroy them, and if they resist, why gosh, they're just defending themselves. And that's how everybody thinks, apparently. As I said, I can't understand it.So when I see what the enemy is doing and has done to me and mine, and I rage in furious hatred of my hated enemy, that's just me raging ok? I don't speak for anybody else at all, even though I may laud and applaud them as fellow fighters. Perhaps I'm a berzerker, and they are not.
That's all.
posted by Grantland | 5:10 AM
39 Comments:
Ya Reindeer, I'm a cad. Mea culpa, mea culpa maximus. Damn these humans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhY1fxQXa3A
don't sweat it mate...we're all friggin closet bezerkers just trying hard to keep a lid on it..
Boy, can I relate to this post. I long for the day that I can lift the lid and let the axe-wielding bezerker
out...
Yea, let the white man now ditch the officer and the gentleman and become the ravening Viking and the Roman and the Hun. Until the problem is solved.
Oops, forget the Hun - too slanty-eyed. Make that the Vandal.
Good idea! I much preferred the Vandals, Goths, Franks, Normans over the goddamned accursed Huns anyway ;) Hey Grant, you ever read that poem about when the Saxons went postal?
"When the Saxon learns to hate"? Ya, good one. Very true.
Found it -wrath of the Saxon. Kipling.
Q. Do you like Kipling?
A. Only in private.
That's it - wrath of the Saxon. He was an amazing poet - quite prophetic. Speaking of poems, here's one I'd usually post on a chat list (without citing the author) and completely rattle everyone's cages when I tell them who wrote it. Let's see if you know:
MOTHER
"When your mother has grown older,
When her dear, faithful eyes
no longer see life as they once did,
When her feet, grown tired,
No longer want to carry her as she walks -
Then lend her your arm in support,
Escort her with happy pleasure.
The hour will come when, weeping, you
Must accompany her on her final walk.
And if she asks you something,
Then give her an answer.
And if she asks again, then speak!
And if she asks yet again, respond to her,
Not impatiently, but with gentle calm.
And if she cannot understand you properly
Explain all to her happily.
The hour will come, the bitter hour,
When her mouth asks for nothing more.
Author?
Well: ?
Adolf Hitler, circa 1923.
Hau!
"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before in the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.... "
"And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.... When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom to-day this poor people is plundered and exploited." Adolf Hitler, in his speech on April 12,1922
http://newsletters.cephasministry.com/hitlerspeeches2.99.html
Ten years later, he made quite a volte face and rejected Christianity in favour of Odinism, or at least for purposes of an "official state religion" urged a return to the pantheism that was prevalent before the arrival of Christianity.
Check out part 1 especially (but also
part 3) of www.zeitgeistmovie.com, also available Zeitgeist
I saw the whole movie. I must check some of the facts. Interesting about Christianity (why is it pertinent?) Jefferson was misquoted. 9/11 and the Fed I knew about. Zyklon-b is a myth (yes, really)..Couple other things..Didn't like the conclusion much. No mention of the J-word (which is what it's all about.) I'll check facts and watch it again. Out.
Can't find any evidence of Hitler renouncing Catholicim - do you have a cite?
.. the Jefferson quote was just an amalgamation, ok.
Hmm - looking like part 1 is a thumbsuck - a debunking attempt, I'll keep going.
http://tektonics.org/copycat/mithra.html
.. and if there was any borrowing at all, everyone did it, for Dec. 25th was "universally distinguished by sacred festivities" [Cum.MM, 196] being that it was (at the time) the winter solstice.
"Next, the cave part. First of all, Mithra was not born of a virgin in a cave; he was born out of solid rock, which presumably left a cave behind -- and I suppose technically the rock he was born out of could have been classified as a virgin!:
And so on. Thumbsuck.
"There is no evidence that Horus was born of a virgin, that he had twelve disciples, or that he was considered incarnation of God"
Debunk, probably Jewish
ends
Hitler renouncing Catholicism:
Hmm OK, maybe "renounce" is a bit too strong, as it implies a public repudiation. This explains it better:
http://www.adherents.com/people/ph/Adolf_Hitler.html
on 'Zeitgeist': Interesting movie, makes some pretty good points but lots of fluff & assumptions thrown in amongst the facts. In all, the bottom line (esp. part 1) delivers a powerful message, the implication of which cannot be denied. Sure, you can nit-pick some of the details but that hardly constitutes a debunk of the whole.
@ Grantland: Would you describe yourself as a Christian?
UG, it's only part1 that I dispute. Factually innacurate, it is an attempt to debunk Christianity. It fails because it lies.
"Would you describe yourself as a Christian? "
Nominally yes; in reality - increasingly, yes.
On the part 1 bit, ja, lots of holes and assumptions, but its really not new - check out the Gnostics and Mithraism for parallels.
Part 3's a bit sanitised so as not to offend you know who but the end ruined it - chipped Big Brother society, much like the BS those (Biblical Revelations) doomsday prophets spout about the "mark of the beast".
As for your beliefs, thanks for being honest. I know some far-right guys who are convinced that the whole of Christianity is a Jewish plot, and they offer some fairly compelling, rational arguments. Then you get sects like Jews for Jesus, all terribly confusing. All I can say is, thank God I'm an atheist :)
UG, I checked the link you gave me on H's religion - I don't buy it. I think it's a pack of lies, in fact. One thing I have learned about these people is that they are inveterate liars and slanderers. The Jew is the master of the lie - so true. I want something Hitler said in public, not some scurrilous Jewish anecdotes.
Re my beliefs, yes, I was an atheist too. But, increasingly, the more I read and learn, the more I understand, the more sense Christianity - specifically the sayings of Jesus - seems to me. When you understand the Levites/pharisees /Cabbalists/zionists, you come to understand evil. Jesus baffled and defied this evil, they killed him; yet he won. Not that I buy the more primitive embellishments - but the message is real.
A Jewish plot - maybe. Depends on how one interprets the message.
Talmudists, not cabbalists.
If you don't mind me asking:
How do you reconcile your political and religious beliefs? The Christian Bible has as it's first Testament an entirely Judaic collection of books, ethics, history and worldview.
The second Testament revolves entirely around Jesus, a Jew. It is replete with Jewish history. By extrapolation, the Christian values espoused are intrinsically Jewish values. The holy cities, the prophets, the heroes are all Jewish without exception, and the holy land is Israel. Christianity promotes altruism and self-sacrifice - turn the other cheek, love thine enemies...
Now contrast this with Judaism, the world's ONLY racially exclusive religion. Unlike Christianity, Judaism does not promote itself. To become a Jew is an incredibly difficult thing to do, whereas thousands of flatnoses are converted into Christianity every day. Judaism believes in an eye for an eye - the dune coons in Palestine will attest to that. Furthermore, it strictly forbids intermarriage and keeps sacred its culture and race. Try date a Jewish chick and you'll see what I mean.
To be honest, I know very little of Judaism, but from a White Nationalist perspective it seems to be something we Whites should be doing. Instead, our own Christianity urges us to bend over & take it up the bum from our enemies, then tells us to love them and forgive them? To me this is so incredibly messed up that it seems more like a religion of racial suicide, whereas Judaism seems focused on racial survival.
And boy, survive they have, the Jews- you've got to hand them that. 5 600 years and counting, I believe. No wonder some think / suspect the Christianity meme was a clever Jewish ploy, invented 2000 years ago by some rabbis in Jerusalem who at the time were being controlled rather mercilessly by Rome, and designed to slowly but insidiously embed itself in the European mental hard-wiring. If this theory is true, its worked like a bomb - just look at multi-culti so hard at work in the EU & USA. Sure, you can blame the Jews for inventing it for our benefit (or their benefit & our doom, as the case may be) but the biggest promoters of it these days are the Christian churches.
The only glaring exception to this multi-culti is interestingly, Israel and the various Jewish communities around the world. That alone lends credence to this otherwise fanciful but temptingly sensible theory.
Just my atheistic 2 cents worth.
Here's a conjecture: If Christianity was bad for us (gentiles) why then do Jews hate it so much? Why are they trying to pervert and destroy it?
So maybe it was a Jewish plot that went awry. Or maybe not. Anyway.. enough of that.
I have a long answer - I'll give it later. I was married to a Jewish chick for 3 years God help me. No comment on that.
Ok. First, the (Methodist)Christianity I was raised with did not adore multicult, taking it up the bum etc. It was solid virtues like honesty and work.. that was stressed. And some of the Jewish Old Testament is similarly valid. Other, (twisted I believe) interpretations - well , sure, are destructive. But one can interpret anything destructively.
Certainly, if you're fighting a war (as we are), the old testament has more relevance than the new. If you're trying to build a peaceful, sucessful civilization, restraint, honesty and mutual help among one's own, and other WASP values.. are better than Buddhism or paganism or anything else.
Vikings and Odin and Thor is good for war. What about the peace? Am I sounding pragmatic, rather than fervent? Maybe. I'd certainly hate to try to persuade the Boers that Odin might be the way to go.
You asked: "Why are they trying to pervert and destroy it?"
To keep up appearances ;)
But seriously, who says they are? I think Islam is much more of a threat to them than Christianity.
Married to a Jewish chick for 3 years! Hehe OK, then you know all about the fine art of guilt manipulation! But I feel your pain brother - my wife is half Jewish - her father is a Christian but her mother (whose name I refuse to speak)
or my mother-in-law (lord have mercy)a non-practising Jewess
is a demon from the darkest pits of Hades.
You haven't been paying attention. Why do you think the churches are so corrupted and confused? Did it "just happen"? WE are the threat, and it is us they are attacking - talk to any number of informed white Nationalists.. try Davidduke.com.. man there's so much - the media, the schools, the corrupted politicians..
They laugh at Islam. Dunecoons, they think. Only whites can threaten them.
"Odin might be the way to go"
Agreed. However, they (Boers) associate it with Satanism. Very few people appreciate the real ancient Indo-European meanings & metaphors represented by symbols such as the hakenkreuz (swastika) the pentagram and the ankh.
Strangely enough, the only warlike religion which seems to be gaining strong currency amongst the extreme right Boers is that of Israel Vision. They believe they are the true Jews, and that the Jews of today are imposters (almost like the discredited Khazar theory). Their bible excludes the new testament (I think, could be wrong) and is printed in both Afrikaans and Hebrew. Most of the Boeremag guys belong to this sect. Barend Strydom, the Pretoria Wit Wolf who offed 8 flatnoses in a shooting spree belongs to the Dogters van Sion (daughters of Zion) subsect of IV. And they all babble incessantly over something called the dual seedline. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice used to say.
Odin or anything else is a distraction. Khazars are well validated. Gotta go.
Interesting read fellas ... lot of good info . Thanks .
Post a Comment
<< Home